Clover Hill Swimming Club

By Gabriel Levin on April 4th, 2016

Clover Hill Swimming Club, Inc. v. Goldsboro

The Clover Hill Swimming Club was a swim club in the Millington section of Long Hill Township in Morris County, New Jersey. The club operated in the 1960s in the suburban New York City metropolitan region. The club first opened in 1963; members were required to buy a $350 debenture bond and pay an annual fee of $150. The club ranged over 170 acres, offering recreational facilities for lake swimming, tennis, skating and golfing.

Clover Hill Swimming Club, Inc. v. GoldsboroCourt Case

In 1966, the Clover Hill Swimming Club was involved in a court case with Robert F. Goldsboro, an African American veterinarian.

The Grounds

In October 1963, Dr. Goldsboro claimed that he had been refused membership in Clover Hill because of his race. At the time of Goldsboro’s application to join the club, 250 families held membership with the maximum capacity of membership being 400 families. Goldsboro completed and sent his application to join the club, but upon not hearing back, called the club and was told that his application would be acted on unfavorably. Then, the club claimed that they had lost the application and sent him new forms.

After Goldsboro sent the second set of forms, the club rejected his request on the grounds that Goldsboro’s references did not know him socially. Bishop Rath, the leader of Goldsboro’s congregation, testified that he had received a call from the club to elaborate on the reference, to which Rath vouched for Goldsboro’s character. However, the club asked if Rath had known Goldsboro socially, “had dinner together and cocktails together and played cards together.” Two other members of Bishop Rath’s congregation were accepted into the club. In addition, other club member applicants testified that they had received personal interviews after submitting applications while Dr. Goldsboro had not.

Aftermath

The Clover Hill Swimming Club returned a statement that since they were a distinctly private facility and therefore exempt from coverage by the Law Against Discrimination. However, the court ruled the club to be a public accommodation because it advertised to the public. The court also ruled that any establishment declaring itself as a “club” cannot be an indication of being “distinctly private.” As a result, the Director of the Division on Civil Rights (Division) directed the club to admit Goldsboro, to delete from the application the request for information containing church activities, and to refrain from violating the Law Against Discrimination. The Clover Hill Swimming Club appealed this decision to the Supreme Court of New Jersey, where precedent was held.

Works Consulted

The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Clover Hill Swimming Club, Inc. v. Goldsboro. 4 Apr. 1966.

Justia US Law.

Wolcott, Victoria W.. Race, Riots, and Roller Coasters: the Struggle over Segregated Recreation in America.

Latest News

October 29, 2019

What to Do After a Car Accident Injury

Being involved in a car accident can be a scary experience, one you hopefully never have to endure. However, Pennsylvania has more than 120,000 miles of roads and highways where more than 125,000 motor vehicle …

October 24, 2019

Types of Truck Accidents

  Across America, hundreds of thousands of trucks move large loads across the country every day. Each year, more than 4,500 truck drivers find themselves involved in fatal accidents, and in even more cases, passengers in …

October 20, 2019

Neck and Back Injuries After a Car Accident: Understanding the Average Settlement

After a car accident, injured individuals are generally most concerned with getting back on their feet. But how does one do that following an injury? Back and neck injuries are some of the most common …

view more

Free Case Consultation

Fill out the form below to schedule a free initial consultation